Two sides of the coin: measuring and communicating the trustworthiness of online information

Journal of Trust Management

Table 2 Graphs (and their associated values for Recency, Competence, Corroboration, Popularity, and Proximity) where there is a possibility that graph size may have impacted trustworthiness scores given by study participants

Graph #	Re	Cm	Cr	Po	Pr	Number affected by size	Expected value	Average deviation of scores from the expected value
2	13	94	20	33	46	9	51	21
15	21	0	31	70	15	9	17	16
33	1	14	12	30	9	11	8	5
106	19	14	30	0	32	10	15	8
143	63	0	2	57	37	10	19	18
148	63	2	25	25	1	11	16	16
150	35	1	73	35	7	9	24	20

We also show the expected trustworthiness value and the average deviation of scores given by participants to that value.

Graph #	Re	Cm	Cr	Po	Pr	Number affected by size	Expected value	Average deviation of scores from the expected value
2	13	94	20	33	46	9	51	21
15	21	0	31	70	15	9	17	16
33	1	14	12	30	9	11	8	5
106	19	14	30	0	32	10	15	8
143	63	0	2	57	37	10	19	18
148	63	2	25	25	1	11	16	16
150	35	1	73	35	7	9	24	20

Graph #	Re	Cm	Cr	Po	Pr	Number affected by size	Expected value	Average deviation of scores from the expected value
2	13	94	20	33	46	9	51	21
15	21	0	31	70	15	9	17	16
33	1	14	12	30	9	11	8	5
106	19	14	30	0	32	10	15	8
143	63	0	2	57	37	10	19	18
148	63	2	25	25	1	11	16	16
150	35	1	73	35	7	9	24	20

Graph #	Re	Cm	Cr	Po	Pr	Number affected by size	Expected value	Average deviation of scores from the expected value
2	13	94	20	33	46	9	51	21
15	21	0	31	70	15	9	17	16
33	1	14	12	30	9	11	8	5
106	19	14	30	0	32	10	15	8
143	63	0	2	57	37	10	19	18
148	63	2	25	25	1	11	16	16
150	35	1	73	35	7	9	24	20